As you probably know Presidents Day is a Federal Holiday
that is celebrated on the third Monday in February. When I was growing up Presidents’ Day didn’t
exist. As, a matter of fact, the day we
now call Presidents’ Day the Federal Government officially calls Washington’s
Birthday. This is what I remember as a
kid in school.
Actually February was a month I – if not most kids – looked
forward to the most out of the school year (excepting maybe June which meant
the end of the school year). I say that
because it was the only month that had two “holidays”. We – I— looked forward to being off from
school on Lincoln’s Birthday, which was February 12 and Washington’s Birthday,
which was February 22. I do realize that
Lincoln’s
birthday was never a Federal holiday, but it was observed as a legal holiday in
a number of states for some time. And
some states that celebrate Washington's Birthday still also recognize Lincoln's Birthday as a
separate legal holiday. (Washington's Birthday
became an official federal holiday in 1885 after President Chester A. Arthur
signed a bill making it such.)
I also remember that these days were not always celebrated
on a Monday, but on the day of the week on which they actually fell. The Monday celebration didn’t begin until
1971 as a result of the Uniform Monday Holiday Act that Congress passed and
which was signed into law in 1968, but taking effect January 1, 1971. This moved the official observance of
Washington’s Birthday to the third Monday in February. Though still on the “books” as Washington’s Birthday, the
holiday is traditionally called Presidents’ Day, because of the common belief
that it honored both Presidents Washington and Lincoln, seeing as how it fell
after Lincoln’s birthday, and before Washington’s, but actually coincides with
neither. Some states which had
previously celebrated Lincoln’s
Birthday dropped the observance after the Federal reform supporting the notion
that the two presidential birthdays had been combined.
So, whose day is it?
Is it a day to celebrate George Washington or Abraham
Lincoln – or both? Or, should
Presidents’ Day honor more than just these two presidents?
The idea of a Presidents’ Day to honor more than one
president is not a new one. In 1951 the
"President's Day National Committee" was formed by Harold Stonebridge Fischer of Compton,
California, who became its
National Executive Director for the next two decades. The purpose was not to honor any particular
President, but to honor the office of the Presidency. Long story short, it never happened.
Now a day to honor the presidency of the United States, or presidents as a
whole is not a bad idea. Consider the
two presidents that are presumably “honored” on Presidents’ Day.
George Washington, our first president was certainly a man
of accomplishment. He is known as the
“Father of Our Country”, and arguably, it could be said that without his
leadership in the Revolutionary War, there would be no United States of
America.
And, Abraham Lincoln, the president during a time that may
have been the worse strife for America,
notably the Civil War (or the War Between the States, as it is also commonly
called), certainly risked his life in the pursuit of holding our nation
together. I won’t get into speculation
of what this land would be like if two countries existed on this American soil
– a United States of America
and a Confederate States of America – that is for another
writer or another time. President
Lincoln’s assassination speaks of the consequences that one could face holding
down the office of the President of the United States.
But, are these the only two Presidents that should have some
honor or recognition?
How about the other presidents who lost their lives to this
job? There were James Garfield, William
McKinley and John F. Kennedy, all of whom were taken by an assassin’s bullet.
(And yes, I do remember where I was on the day President Kennedy was
assassinated.) These, of course, are the
extreme. But, are there other Presidents
worth honoring?
Being President of
the United States
is a stressful job. Compare pictures of
President Obama today with pictures of him when he first took office. It looks as if he aged quite a lot in
these past few years. I’ve noticed this
with other Presidents as well.
Noticeably, the job takes a lot out of you. Sometimes you have to make decisions that
hold the very fate of the nation – and the lives of citizens –at risk. What President wouldn’t be under a lot of
stress having to send soldiers into war – or worrying how to protect citizens
against terrorists?
Look at the administrations of many of the Presidents and
see the issues they had to deal with through their presidency – war, civil
rights, and social reform – many of the same issues that are being dealt with
today. It certainly is stressful having
to deal with these issues, hoping that the decisions you make are more helpful
to the welfare of the country than detrimental. Yes, they sometimes have to make such hard
decisions.
Thomas Jefferson had to send a fledgling navy to stave off
the pirates waylaying American ships along the Barbary Coast of Africa. This from a man who had been opposed earlier
in his political career to funding a navy for anything more than a coastal defense.
James Monroe introduced the Monroe Doctrine which proclaimed the Americas should be free from future
European colonization and free from European interference in sovereign countries'
affairs. The Monroe Doctrine held that
the United States considered
the Western Hemisphere as no longer a place
for European colonization; that any future effort to gain further political
control in the hemisphere or to violate the independence of existing states
would be treated as an act of hostility.
This, in some ways, helped in the United
States expansion across North America, primarily
unfettered, along with the Louisiana Purchase
of 1803. But, mainly, through it the
United States was the first nation to set an example to the rest of the world
for its support of the "cause of liberty and humanity."
There was James Polk, a President possibly not as well-known
as some others, whose unpopular decision to go to war with Mexico ultimately gained
for America the states of California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona and New Mexico.
Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt who assumed the presidency upon
the death of President McKinley became known as "trust-buster" for
his aggressive attacks on trusts (curbing the power of large corporations)
during his two terms. Roosevelt was the
force behind the completion of the Panama Canal.
He sent the Great White Fleet on a world tour to demonstrate American power. He also negotiated an end to the Russo-Japanese War, for which he won the Nobel Peace Prize – the first American to win the Nobel Prize in any field.
And then there is Harry "The buck stops here" Truman who made what very
well may have been the most controversial decision in modern history – the
dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
And Lyndon Johnson, another Vice-President who became President
after the man he served was assassinated. Because his containment policy
required America to make a
serious effort to stop all Communist expansion, he expanded the numbers and
roles of the American military in Vietnam.
And let’s not forget “The Great Communicator”, Ronald Reagan
who revitalized the American military, and who played a major role in ending
the Cold War.
George W. Bush presided over a presidency that saw quite
possibly the most devastating attack ever on U. S. citizens on American soil.
I’ve mentioned only a small number of the 43 Presidents
(Grover Cleveland served two non-consecutive terms filling the roles of 22nd
and 24th President) who have served in this great office—an office
that at times in history has possibly been the most important in the world.
Yes, the job of the President of the United States of America is a
stressful one. And I think it is an
office worth honoring.
None of these men were or are perfect. Some came from humble beginnings – some from
wealth. Some had great
accomplishments—some not so great. You
may like some and dislike some. But the
thing is they all stepped into an office where sometimes the decisions they
made held fates in the balance. And,
sometimes, they and their decisions were unappreciated.
Whether history looks upon them as great Presidents or
ineffective Presidents, these men all need to be respected. I think they all made decisions that they
felt were the right decisions at the time.
As Harry S. Truman himself wrote later in life about his decision to use
the atomic bomb, "I knew what I was doing when I stopped the war ...
I have no regrets and, under the same circumstances, I would do it again."
I think all of these men truly believed that what they were
doing was best for the country even though history may have proved some wrong. Despite the thanklessness that sometimes came
with the job, I think they loved what they were doing. You would have to love it to step into such a
pressure-filled job.
These men also all proved what I was told as a child, that
in this country anyone (who was born here) could grow up to become President of
the United States of America – perhaps the greatest job on the face of the
Earth.
And that is something to think about.
No comments:
Post a Comment